Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement appears to be a sensationalized summary of an article that claims to reveal the true story behind the Nord Stream pipeline explosion, attributing it to a group of Ukrainians acting out of patriotism and bravery. The tone is dramatic and somewhat informal, focusing on the personal courage and determination of the individuals involved.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as glorifying a dangerous and illegal act, which might indirectly encourage similar behavior. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and it does not violate privacy or dignity. This is neutral.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it sensationalizes a violent act. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more of a narrative account. This is neutral.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society; it could be seen as glorifying a violent act. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform responsibly, as it sensationalizes violence. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.