The statement and accompanying image engage in public discourse by addressing the issue of government spending on immigration and border security. The tone is critical and aims to highlight a perceived inconsistency in government spending priorities.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to divisive rhetoric around immigration. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of migrants, referring to them as 'illegal' which can be seen as dehumanizing. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards migrants. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather presents a one-sided view. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion on government spending and immigration policy. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but could be more responsible in its framing to avoid divisive language.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.