In reply to:
Lance Browning
@lancetylerb05
·
452d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
452d
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the issue of abortion, specifically focusing on the concept of viability and the implications of Roe v. Wade. The tone is analytical and aims to provide a perspective on the legal and ethical dimensions of the abortion debate.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a reasoned argument about viability and legal restrictions, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It addresses the issue at hand without targeting individuals personally. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by discussing the concept of viability and the legal framework of Roe v. Wade, which can foster empathy and compassion for differing viewpoints. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the issue of viability and the legal implications of Roe v. Wade without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a reasoned public discourse on a significant societal issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.