Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically a political campaign and the conduct of a political opponent. The tone is defensive and aims to contrast the speaker's campaign approach with that of their opponent.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but accuses the opponent of lying, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on defending the speaker's position and attacking the opponent. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It accuses the opponent of lying without providing evidence, which could be seen as a personal attack. Significant violation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use the speaker's influence for the betterment of society by highlighting their mission to serve and fight for their supporters. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to some extent, but the accusation of lying without evidence could be seen as lacking integrity. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.