Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement is a political critique aimed at an opponent, suggesting that the opponent is influenced by national groups and will not prioritize local interests. The tone is accusatory and aims to discredit the opponent by associating them with a 'radical agenda' and 'DC party bosses.'
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses charged language to discredit the opponent, which can be harmful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the opponent; it engages in a form of political attack that could be seen as a form of harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is divisive and accusatory. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it resorts to negative campaigning. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.