Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement by Chris Sununu reacts to a public issue involving comments made by a former President about the relative value of two significant national awards. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public figure's statements and their implications for societal values and honors.
- The statement uses the term 'asinine,' which could be considered harsh and potentially harmful. This does not fully align with the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It critiques a public figure's comments without attacking the individual personally. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on critiquing the comments made.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or a reasoned argument. It uses a dismissive term ('asinine') which could be seen as a personal attack rather than constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to address a public issue, but the choice of words could be more responsible and measured. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.