Reposted by Vivek Ramaswamy
The statement critiques Kamala Harris' approach to addressing rising prices by suggesting price controls, which the author claims have historically been ineffective. The statement also argues that there is no evidence of price gouging by American grocery stores, citing their low profit margins. The tone is critical and dismissive of the proposed policy, labeling it as a 'socialist’s dream.'
- The statement does not appear to cause direct harm with words and actions, but the dismissive tone could be seen as unconstructive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use a dismissive tone that could undermine the dignity of others. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it dismisses the proposed policy without offering a constructive alternative. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not do so constructively. It uses a dismissive tone and labels the policy as a 'socialist’s dream,' which could be seen as an ad hominem attack. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but could use its platform more responsibly by offering constructive criticism and engaging in a more respectful dialogue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.