Reposted by Vivek Ramaswamy
Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist
@DeAngelisCorey
·
399d
The statement expresses a strong opinion on a public issue, specifically the termination of the Department of Education, and references a legislative bill (HR 899). It engages in public discourse by addressing a significant policy matter and responding to a political conversation.
- The statement does not directly cause harm with words and actions, but the aggressive tone ('Damn right') could be seen as confrontational. However, it does not explicitly violate this principle.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on a policy issue rather than attacking individuals.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on expressing a strong opinion and advocating for a specific action. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is assertive and dismissive of the Department of Education without providing a detailed argument or engaging with opposing views. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to advocate for a policy change. However, the tone could be more responsible and respectful. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.