Ilhan Omar

Rank 4 of 47

Score 232

Reposted by Ilhan Omar

-4

Vance can’t be Vice President — there’s apparently no level of attack too low for him.

Gwen and Tim, like so many Americans, went through invasive, difficult fertility treatments to start a family.

Makes sense why Mitt Romney said there’s no one he respects less than Vance.

8/20/2024, 5:22:56 PM

The statement criticizes JD Vance for his alleged attacks on Tim Walz regarding IVF treatments, suggesting that Vance's behavior is inappropriate and unworthy of respect. The tone is accusatory and defensive, aiming to defend Walz and criticize Vance.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not strive to do no harm; it engages in a personal attack on JD Vance, calling his actions 'low' and suggesting he is unfit for the Vice Presidency. This violates the principle of doing no harm. (-2 points) [-2]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement respects the privacy and dignity of Gwen and Tim Walz by defending their use of IVF treatments. However, it does not respect the dignity of JD Vance, as it engages in a personal attack. This is a mixed adherence to the principle. (0 points)
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against JD Vance. This violates the principle of constructive criticism. (-2 points) [-2]