Vivek Ramaswamy

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 97

The statement addresses generational roles and societal values, which are public issues. It encourages a specific political stance and lifestyle choices, making it a part of public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause direct harm with words and actions, though it could be seen as provocative to those with differing views. It neither promotes nor explicitly avoids harm.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others by not targeting individuals or groups negatively. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes a specific set of values but does not explicitly foster understanding, empathy, or compassion for differing viewpoints. It is more about rallying support for a particular ideology. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue with those in disagreement. It presents a one-sided view without inviting discussion or addressing counterarguments. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to promote a specific political and social ideology, which the speaker believes is for the betterment of society. However, it does not consider the diverse perspectives within society.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint. However, the responsibility and integrity of the message could be questioned due to its one-sided nature. [+1]