Jill Stien

Rank 45 of 47
|
Score -131

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically political processes and alleged misconduct by a political party. The tone is accusatory and confrontational, and the intent appears to be to expose and criticize perceived unethical behavior by the Democratic Party.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language like 'gaslighting,' 'spies,' and 'sabotage,' which can be seen as harmful and inflammatory. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement accuses a specific group (The Democrats) of unethical behavior without providing concrete evidence, which can be seen as a form of harassment or hate speech. This violates the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters division and animosity. This violates the principle of using words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes broad accusations and personal attacks against a political group. This violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    While the statement exercises free speech, it does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity by making unsubstantiated claims and using inflammatory language. This violates the principle of upholding free speech responsibly and with integrity. [-2]