Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses a significant and contentious public issue, namely the situation in Palestine, and draws historical parallels to other major events such as the Iraq and Vietnam wars, the Holocaust, and the civil rights movement. The tone is assertive and implies a moral judgment about people's stances on these issues.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as divisive by implying moral superiority. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make broad generalizations that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more accusatory and divisive. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes broad generalizations and could be seen as a form of personal attack. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or constructive. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.