Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement addresses a public issue related to representation and inclusion within a political party's convention, specifically focusing on the Palestinian community. The tone is critical and expresses concern over potential exclusion, which is framed as 'Palestinian erasure.' The intent is to call attention to and criticize the DNC's decision, urging for more inclusive representation.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but uses strong language ('Shameful') to criticize the DNC's decision. This could be seen as a minor violation of striving to do no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy for the Palestinian community by highlighting their exclusion. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments but criticizes an organizational decision, which aligns with constructive criticism. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the speaker's influence to advocate for the betterment of society by calling for more inclusive representation. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to address a public concern with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.