Jessica Schulberg
@jessicaschulb
·
445d
The statement 'Put it back.' in response to a conversation about the Democratic Party's platform on the death penalty constitutes public discourse. It engages with a public issue, specifically the policy stance of a major political party on a significant societal issue.
- The statement does not cause harm directly but is a call to action that could be seen as advocating for a policy change.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement is brief and does not provide context or reasoning, so it does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it also does not provide constructive criticism or dialogue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a policy change, which can be seen as an attempt to better society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express an opinion, but the brevity limits the responsibility and integrity of the discourse.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.