The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a public figure (Kamala Harris) and raises a significant societal issue (crime committed by undocumented immigrants). The tone is confrontational and accusatory, and it calls for accountability and action from a political leader.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses a confrontational tone and could be seen as exploiting tragic events for political gain, which may cause emotional harm to the families involved. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the victims' families by publicly naming them in a political challenge. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and lacks a constructive approach. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is a direct challenge and could be seen as a personal attack. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to address a societal issue, but it does so in a way that may not be for the betterment of society due to its confrontational nature. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity due to its accusatory and potentially harmful nature. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.