In reply to:
biggest balls of the mall
@PetsAreEvil
·
444d
The statement 'A modern malevolent strain of it' in response to a conversation about capitalism and corporate influence in politics constitutes public discourse as it engages with a substantive public issue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the context of the conversation could be seen as dismissive or inflammatory.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it is part of a conversation that could be interpreted as dismissive of others' views.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is a brief, critical remark without elaboration. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a terse, critical comment that does not foster meaningful discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform to contribute constructively to the dialogue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.