In reply to:
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the political actions and character of a public figure, and contributes to the civic dialogue by addressing respect and disagreement in politics.
- The statement strives to do no harm by acknowledging respect for the personhood of a political figure, even while disagreeing with their politics. This promotes a more respectful and less harmful discourse. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of the political figure by explicitly stating respect for their personhood, countering the previous negative comment. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by recognizing the courage it took for the political figure to take a stand and by separating personal respect from political disagreement. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by not resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, instead focusing on the actions and character of the political figure in a respectful manner. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.