In reply to:
Liz Mac
@TheLizMac
·
443d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
443d
The statement by @TheLizMac addresses the impact of the 2017 tax cuts, specifically critiquing the distribution of benefits and their effects on inflation and income inequality. The tone is critical and aims to provide a counterpoint to the previous statement praising the tax cuts.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on critiquing policy rather than individuals, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by providing an alternative perspective on the tax cuts, though it could be more empathetic in its delivery. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the tax policy rather than personal attacks, adhering to the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to discuss a significant societal issue, aiming for the betterment of society by addressing economic inequality. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss public policy with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.