The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the policy that high school seniors should pass the same civics exam required of legal immigrants. The statement also mentions an interaction with a young individual at a political event, which adds to the civic dialogue.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions. It acknowledges the young man's courage positively. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by expressing pride in the young man's courage to challenge a policy. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by highlighting the interaction without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the speaker's influence to highlight civic engagement and the importance of understanding policies, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by discussing a policy issue and encouraging civic participation. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.