In reply to:
seabiscuit90
@RickFernandes90
·
443d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
443d
The statement by @marwilliamson constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to corporate influence and its impact on democracy. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to identify and call out specific industries perceived as harmful to society.
- The statement does not directly harm individuals but criticizes industries collectively. It does not violate this principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It targets industries rather than individuals, thus respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of perceived societal issues, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments but rather critiques industries, adhering to this principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight perceived societal issues, aiming for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly to address public concerns. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.