Marianne Williamson

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score -6
8/23/2024, 6:03:23 AM
X
In reply to:
seabiscuit90
@RickFernandes90
·
442d
@marwilliamson What I mean is actual names. The names of the companies, CEOs, Top Shareholders... the movers and shakers. The "masters of the world". Otherwise, how do you hold them accountable?
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
442d
@RickFernandes90 I've named them hundreds of times: Insurance companies, Big Pharma, Big Food, big chemical companies, Big Ag, gun manufacturers, Big Oil and defense contractors.
seabiscuit90
@RickFernandes90
·
442d
@marwilliamson It's time to start using the names of these oligarchs. When you say "oligarchic, parasitic behemoth of corporate overlords" it doesn't mean as much unless you name who they actually are.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
442d
Fifty years of class warfare against 90 per cent of the American people has created more than a problem for individuals.

It’s a structural problem that represents the destruction of our democracy by an oligarchic, parasitic behemoth of corporate overlords whose names were…

The statement '@RickFernandes90 You want me to google them for you...? What, I'm your researcher?:)' is a sarcastic and dismissive response to a request for specific information. It does not substantively engage with the public issue being discussed, which is the identification and accountability of powerful corporate entities. Instead, it shifts the focus to a personal interaction, thereby not contributing meaningfully to the civic dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but its dismissive tone could be seen as unhelpful.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does lack respect for the dignity of the other person. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is sarcastic and dismissive. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to a personal jab rather than addressing the issue at hand. [-1]