Marianne Williamson

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score -6
8/23/2024, 8:01:36 AM
X
In reply to:
Anita Malchiodi Albedi
@SchmaltzDiva
·
440d
@marwilliamson Did the GOP conduct a townhall meeting?
Debates between candidates can be in a townhall meeting style BUT not a convention, Marianne. That's a time for bring the party together in unity NOT pitting party members against each other.
Stop with the bs defense.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
440d
@SchmaltzDiva Actually, it kinda is.
Anita Malchiodi Albedi
@SchmaltzDiva
·
440d
@marwilliamson After the hostility before & outside the convention?
The convention is NOT A TOWNHALL MEETING.
My admiration is growing for her integrity & sense of right.
She didn't let herself get screwed over for a few hundred thou fickle votes.
This post proves U unfit 4 the job.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
441d
The DNC made a terrible mistake - politically and morally - not allowing space on the program for the cries of Gaza. It could have been done as elegantly and as humanely as were the voices of the Goldberg-Polins.

But the Left has been played like a fiddle for a year and a half.…

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the handling of political conventions and the inclusion of diverse voices, including those from Gaza. The tone is defensive and aims to clarify a misunderstanding about the nature of the event and the perceived animosity.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm and seeks to clarify a misunderstanding, thus upholding the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding by explaining that the animosity was created by the exclusion of voices, not by the inclusion of certain groups. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the issue directly and not resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue. [+1]