Vivek Ramaswamy

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 89

The statement addresses a public issue, specifically a ruling by Arizona’s Supreme Court regarding a law that requires proof of citizenship to vote. The tone suggests a critical stance towards those who find the law controversial, implying a broader societal or political conflict.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm with words and actions, but the tone is somewhat confrontational, which could contribute to divisiveness. Minor violation. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others. Adheres to the principle. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on highlighting a conflict. Minor violation. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It implies a negative judgment on those who find the law controversial without engaging in a reasoned debate. Minor violation. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to express an opinion on a public issue. Adheres to the principle. [+1]