Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the endorsement of a political figure, Donald Trump, by a member of the Kennedy family. It reflects on the implications of this endorsement and invokes the legacy of a historical figure, Robert F. Kennedy, to critique the endorsement.
- The statement expresses strong disapproval but does not appear to incite harm directly. However, the use of words like 'outraged' and 'disgusted' could be seen as emotionally charged.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others to some extent but could be seen as bordering on personal attack by calling the endorsement 'gaudy and obscene.' [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on expressing disapproval and outrage. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses strong language that could be seen as a personal attack on Bobby Kennedy's decision. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to express a strong opinion, but the responsibility and integrity of the language used could be questioned.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.