In reply to:
Bill Scher
@billscher
·
260d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
260d
The statement by @marwilliamson constitutes public discourse as it engages with public figures, political endorsements, and public perceptions of political agendas. The tone is clarifying and defensive, aiming to correct a misinterpretation of her stance on political figures and their agendas.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a clarification rather than an attack. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying her position and correcting a misinterpretation. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a misunderstanding without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement implicitly acknowledges a potential mistake in how her previous comments were interpreted and seeks to correct it. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to clarify her stance. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.