In reply to:
Jon Billingsley
@chicojuanito395
·
246d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
246d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically political discourse and the interaction between public figures and their critics. The tone is defensive and somewhat confrontational, responding to a derogatory comment about the speaker's political views.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm with words and actions. It uses a derogatory term ('bitch') and responds in a confrontational manner, which can escalate conflict rather than resolve it. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others and engages in a form of cyberbullying by calling out the original commenter in a public forum and using derogatory language. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it responds to a personal attack with another personal attack, failing to promote a respectful exchange of ideas. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.