In reply to:
🗡️🦅💚Karen Rose💜
@WhimsicalRose11
·
221d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
221d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with substantive public issues, specifically the role and actions of the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) and broader political concerns. The tone is critical and urgent, expressing a strong opinion about the perceived direction of the SCOTUS and its impact on democracy.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words and actions, but its strong language could be seen as inflammatory to some. It does not explicitly call for harm, so it partially adheres to this principle.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It criticizes an institution rather than individuals, thus respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and awareness of perceived threats to democracy, but its tone is more alarmist than empathetic or compassionate. It partially adheres to this principle.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on institutional critique rather than individual character attacks, adhering to this principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to raise awareness about significant public issues, aiming for the betterment of society by advocating against what it perceives as a march towards fascism. It adheres to this principle. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by addressing public concerns, though its strong language could be seen as polarizing. It upholds the principle of free speech but could be more balanced in its approach. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.