In reply to:
Jane
@SandraM28934355
·
217d
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the legality and morality of flag burning, a public issue that touches on free speech and legal principles. The tone is respectful and aims to contribute to the civic dialogue by questioning the appropriateness of a law that mandates jail time for flag burning.
- The statement strives to do no harm by expressing a personal opinion without attacking others. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by explaining the author's perspective on the issue of flag burning and its legal consequences. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the issue without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by discussing the implications of a law that affects this right and uses the platform responsibly. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.