In reply to:
Rick Wilson
@TheRickWilson
·
212d
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
213d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the behavior of a public figure in the context of political discourse. The tone is accusatory and critical, aiming to call out perceived online bullying by TheRickWilson.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm with words and actions. It accuses TheRickWilson of bullying, which could be seen as a form of harm itself. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others to some extent by addressing a public figure in a public forum. However, it accuses the individual of bullying, which could be seen as a form of harassment. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a personal attack by accusing TheRickWilson of bullying without providing evidence or engaging in a constructive manner. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.