Marianne Williamson

The statement by @mgolubiewski constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about political platforms and ideologies, specifically addressing the misconception of communism in relation to Kamala Harris' economic platform.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the tone is somewhat dismissive and could be perceived as condescending. This could be seen as a minor violation of striving to do no harm with words.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains respect for privacy and dignity, although the tone could be more respectful.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It could have been more constructive by explaining why the platform is not communism rather than just dismissing the other person's view.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it also does not foster constructive dialogue. It could have been more effective by providing a reasoned argument or evidence to support the claim.