In reply to:
Tony Marello
@tonystyles80
·
203d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
203d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the nutritional standards of baby food and the political dynamics surrounding potential solutions.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a critique of political figures and their potential for creating structural change, which is a legitimate part of public discourse. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains a respectful tone towards the individuals mentioned. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by discussing the trustworthiness of political figures in addressing a public issue. However, it could be more empathetic and compassionate in its language.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of political figures and does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by addressing a significant public issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.