Marianne Williamson

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 104
8/25/2024, 11:37:08 AM
X
In reply to:
Type 3 Civilization
@3Civilization
·
202d
@marwilliamson @jillajosey Sorry @marwilliamson - Trump IS an existential threat!

NEVER, NEVER, NEVER appease fascists! EVER!
Fascists want decent people to look away!

We appeased Hitler- then he invaded Europe and killed six million Jews!

Trump wants people to be exhausted and give him what he wants!
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
202d
@jillajosey Okay I’ll try that
Jill Josey
@jillajosey
·
203d
@marwilliamson I suggest you quit saying Trump is an existential threat and just say you disagree with a policy and why. You all keep saying we need to come together and then you spread fear about those who disagree with your politics.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
203d
I grew up in a home where all the aunts and uncles and cousins had breakfast together on Sunday morning.

This would be a common conversation:

One of my uncles would say, "Don't listen to your father, kids. You'll never make a dime!" Then my father would say, "Don't listen to…

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue, namely the characterization of political figures and the appropriate way to communicate political disagreements. The tone of the statement is measured and seeks to address the method of communication rather than the substance of the disagreement. The intent appears to be to promote a more effective way of discussing political issues, particularly with those who may not already agree with the speaker's viewpoint.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on communication methods rather than attacking individuals. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by suggesting that specific examples are more effective in communicating with those who do not already agree. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the method of communication rather than engaging in personal attacks. [+1]