Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement involves a journalist questioning a public figure about a political issue, specifically the framing of Vice President Kamala Harris as a change candidate by the Democratic Party. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with a substantive public issue and contributes to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a straightforward question aimed at understanding a political strategy. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by seeking clarification on a political issue, which can help the public better understand the Democratic Party's strategy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue. It questions a political strategy without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity by asking a relevant and important question. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.