Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the political landscape and the choices available to voters. The tone is accusatory and critical, suggesting that both major political parties are equally harmful and equating their actions to genocide.
- The statement uses strong and harmful language by equating political choices to genocide, which can be seen as doing harm with words. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others by making a severe accusation without substantial evidence, which can be seen as a form of verbal aggression. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it fosters division and fear. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a sweeping generalization and does not provide a basis for constructive discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so irresponsibly by making extreme and unsubstantiated claims. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.