Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement criticizes Governor Tim Walz for his actions related to the Enbridge Line 3 pipeline and the treatment of Indigenous water protectors. It includes a link to a YouTube video featuring an activist and an image with a critical message about the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and its treatment of Indigenous people. The tone is accusatory and aims to hold a public figure accountable for perceived injustices.
- The statement aims to highlight harm done to Indigenous water protectors, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm by bringing attention to the issue. However, the accusatory tone could be seen as potentially harmful to the reputation of the individuals involved. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the activist by sharing their perspective but could be seen as disrespectful to Governor Walz by accusing him of enabling police brutality without providing a balanced view. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy for Indigenous water protectors by highlighting their struggle, but it does so in a confrontational manner that may not foster constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of Governor Walz and the DNC, but it does so in a manner that could be perceived as a personal attack rather than constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to bring attention to an important societal issue, which aligns with the principle of using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.