Jill Stien

The statement and the conversation it is part of constitute public discourse as they engage in a discussion about potential candidates for a public health position, which is a matter of public concern. The tone of the statement by @RonPlacone is mocking and dismissive, and the reply by @RonPlacone (😂) further reinforces this tone. The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or constructive dialogue and instead engages in personal attacks and ad hominem arguments.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does harm by mocking and dismissing an individual based on their beliefs and perceived health conditions. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individual being mocked, engaging in cyberbullying and harassment. [-2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but rather ridicule and dismissal. [-2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but instead resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. [-2]