Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically the political landscape and the promotion of a political party and candidate. It also responds to a public figure's critique, contributing to the civic dialogue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as divisive by labeling another political group as 'UnDemocrats.' This could be seen as a minor violation of striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes a specific political action (voting for Jill Stein) but does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is neutral in this regard.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by suggesting an alternative action (voting for Jill Stein) but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It responds to a critique with a call to action rather than attacking the individual. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to promote a political cause responsibly and with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.