Marianne Williamson

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 104
8/25/2024, 11:53:28 PM
X
In reply to:
Jan
@Jan01011000
·
201d
@marwilliamson Please use the appropriate terms. This issue has nothing to do with gender or apartheid. What is going on is that there is cruelty against women in Islamic countries where Sharia law is in effect. Woke retweeting will make no difference.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
201d
If each of us commit to retweeting each day even one post about what is happening to women in Afghanistan, it will help create the energy needed to take on their gender apartheid.

With enough global outrage, the Taliban can become such an international pariah that real…
Habib Khan
@HabibKhanT
·
201d
The Taliban's Minister of Education says that girls' schools are likely to remain closed permanently. After the initial ban, there was hope they might reopen, but that hope is now gone. They lied. The Taliban haven’t changed and remain the same fanatics they were.

The statement '@Jan01011000 Puhleez' is a dismissive and sarcastic response to a previous comment. It does not substantively engage with the public issue being discussed, which is the treatment of women under Taliban rule in Afghanistan. The tone is dismissive and does not contribute to a constructive dialogue or public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The dismissive tone does not strive to do no harm and can be seen as belittling the previous commenter's concerns. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does lack respect for the dignity of the previous commenter. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it dismisses the previous commenter's point without engaging with it. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a personal attack in the form of sarcasm and does not address the substance of the previous comment. [-2]