Vivek Ramaswamy

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 106

The statement critiques the defenses of Kamala Harris's policies, suggesting that her supporters are not willing to defend her positions substantively. It implies a lack of serious commitment to the policies mentioned and directs readers to a website for further information.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but could be seen as dismissive of the policies and their defenders. It does not use inflammatory language.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It critiques public policies and their defenses without attacking individuals personally.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is critical and somewhat dismissive, focusing on perceived inconsistencies in policy defense. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or specific arguments. It implies a lack of serious defense without offering detailed counterarguments. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to critique public policies. However, it could be more responsible by providing a more balanced and detailed analysis.