Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages with a public issue, specifically the impact of Jill Stein and the Green Party on the Democratic Party, and encourages voters to take action. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses political dynamics and voter behavior.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as encouraging actions that might indirectly affect election outcomes.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does respond to a conversation that includes strong language against Jill Stein.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on political strategy. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments directly, but it does respond to a conversation that includes such attacks.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to encourage political action, though the integrity of the encouragement can be debated. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.