The statement and accompanying image constitute public discourse as they engage in a critique of the Democratic Party and its role in the political system, suggesting it serves corporate interests similar to the Republican Party. The statement and image aim to provoke thought and discussion about the nature of political representation and the influence of corporate money in politics.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement and image use strong language and imagery to criticize the Democratic Party, which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory. However, it does not directly incite violence or hatred.
 [-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement and image do not respect the privacy and dignity of the individuals depicted, as they are used to make a political point in a potentially derogatory manner.
 [-2]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement and image aim to promote understanding and awareness of perceived issues within the political system, but the tone is accusatory rather than empathetic or compassionate.
 [-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement and image engage in criticism of the Democratic Party, but the language used is harsh and could be seen as a personal attack rather than constructive criticism.
 [-2]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement and image use the platform to raise awareness about perceived issues in the political system, which can be seen as an attempt to use influence for societal betterment.
 [+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement and image exercise free speech to critique political entities, but the responsibility and integrity of the message are questionable due to the harsh and potentially inflammatory language used.