The statement and the accompanying conversation engage in public discourse by discussing political polling data, which is relevant to the public's understanding of the current political landscape and electoral prospects. The tone is informative and aims to clarify the nature and reliability of different types of polling data.
- The statement strives to do no harm by providing factual information and clarifying the nature of the data being discussed. It does not engage in any harmful rhetoric or misinformation. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by explaining the difference between public polling and internal political polling, which can help the audience better interpret the data. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing potential skepticism about polling data and providing a reasoned explanation. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to inform the public about the nuances of polling data, which can contribute to a more informed electorate. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.