In reply to:
The Poets Of Zwan ⭕️🪶🏴☠️
@TwoThousand_17
·
154d
The statement 'No, not at all like a Catholic nun.' is a response to a conversation about the Taliban's new 'vice and virtue' laws that severely restrict women's freedoms. The original post by @marwilliamson highlights a serious public issue concerning human rights and gender equality. The reply by @TwoThousand_17, and the subsequent response, engage in a comparison that could be seen as trivializing the severity of the situation.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but it could be seen as insensitive to the gravity of the issue, thus indirectly causing harm by trivializing it. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not show respect for the dignity of those affected by the Taliban's laws. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it diverts the conversation away from the serious issue at hand. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It shifts the focus to a less relevant comparison, which could be seen as a form of deflection rather than engagement. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly. It uses the platform to make a comparison that could be seen as minimizing the serious human rights issue being discussed. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.