NY Post Opinion
@NYPostOpinion
·
430d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of campus protests and suggesting a course of action for students. It praises a specific group for their actions and encourages others to follow their example. The tone is supportive of the UNC fraternity members and critical of the protesters.
- The statement could be seen as doing harm by labeling protesters as disruptive and intimidating, which may not foster a constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the protesters, as it generalizes them in a negative light. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy towards the UNC fraternity members but not towards the protesters.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue with those in disagreement, as it labels protesters negatively without addressing their concerns. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to promote a specific viewpoint, encouraging students to follow the example of the UNC fraternity members. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.