The statement 'This shouldn’t be controversial.' in response to a conversation about stopping noncitizens from voting and passing the SAVE Act attached to a spending bill in September constitutes public discourse. It engages with a public issue related to voting rights and legislative actions.
- The statement itself is neutral and does not appear to cause harm directly. However, the broader context of the conversation could be polarizing and potentially harmful to certain groups, but the statement does not explicitly contribute to harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains a neutral tone.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more of a declarative stance that implies a certain viewpoint should be universally accepted.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a general comment on the issue at hand.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to express an opinion on a public issue responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.