In reply to:
Casey Means, MD
@CaseyMeansMD
·
300d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to health, media influence, and potential conflicts of interest within NGOs. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting that certain NGOs may have conflicts of interest due to funding from processed food lobbyists.
- The statement aims to expose potential conflicts of interest, which could be seen as striving to do no harm by promoting transparency. However, the accusatory tone may cause harm by potentially spreading distrust without providing evidence. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the NGOs mentioned, as it accuses them of conflicts of interest without providing specific evidence. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters suspicion and distrust. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a broad accusation without engaging in a detailed discussion or providing evidence. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about potential issues within NGOs, which could be seen as using influence for the betterment of society. However, the lack of evidence and accusatory tone undermine this potential positive impact. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.