Tulsi Gabbard 🌺
@TulsiGabbard
·
300d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically the performance and policies of a political figure and administration. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting that voting for Kamala Harris would result in continued censorship and abuse of power.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory. It does not promote physical harm but could contribute to a polarized environment. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It criticizes a public figure's policies and actions, which is within the bounds of respectful discourse. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a broad, accusatory claim without providing evidence or inviting discussion. Significant violation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as irresponsible by making unsubstantiated claims. It does not uphold the integrity of responsible discourse. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.