Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement reports on a public issue involving a former president's visit to a national cemetery, a physical altercation, and potential legal violations. It addresses public concerns about the behavior of public figures and the respect for national monuments and laws.
- The statement strives to do no harm by reporting factual information about a public incident. It does not appear to sensationalize or exaggerate the events. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the actions of public figures and not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing information about the incident and its implications, though it does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by reporting on the actions of public figures and potential legal violations without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by informing the public about a significant issue involving a former president and a national cemetery. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.