Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement by Harris addresses the inclusion of diverse viewpoints in decision-making processes, which is a substantive engagement with public issues and contributes to civic dialogue. Therefore, it constitutes public discourse.
- The statement does no harm and promotes a constructive approach to governance by advocating for diverse perspectives. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by recognizing the value of different views and experiences. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by suggesting the inclusion of opposing viewpoints without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence for the betterment of society by advocating for inclusive decision-making processes that could benefit the public. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by promoting a balanced and inclusive approach to governance. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.