Rashida Tlaib

Rank 9 of 47
|
Score 187

The statement addresses a significant public issue, namely the conflict between Israel and Palestine, and calls for a specific policy action (ending arms sales to Israel). It is critical of both Israel's actions and the complicity of the speaker's government, making it a substantive engagement with public issues and thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language ('war crimes,' 'total erasure') which could be seen as harmful, but it is aimed at criticizing actions rather than individuals. This partially adheres to the principle but could be more measured in tone. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make a strong accusation against a nation-state. It respects the dignity of individuals but is harsh on the state.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more accusatory and calls for action rather than dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments; it focuses on actions and policies. However, it does not invite constructive dialogue.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the speaker's influence to call for a policy change, which they believe would better society by ending arms sales to a country they accuse of committing war crimes. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to address a significant public issue, but the tone could be more responsible and measured.